IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07

Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com> Mon, 27 November 2017 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <magnusn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F8D126D05; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:53:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yEeotwwRbnIP; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:53:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl0-x22e.google.com (mail-pl0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD8A11200E5; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:53:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 62so7859184plc.2; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:53:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DeR+7Sl+3Xwy/Xgv56orwp0zcR58krCB8G6tum5f5NQ=; b=q4XmwTJX7Mu+obnTJNPbZVtf0XcA89AKq30p9oX600dt7VToPguE/i5sylHMINMkiI I0Gvnyuza4S0pDm60hvB73AZ2fOa2TIO0l0H4kg8mwaVKk1BRjaupWkF/+lbj0ekjVkb MtfR/4RH4T/V9bhF4B89C9R6cLiLeCV13WZ8xsNx8Gzqdpn3+u9BZc8eQEdBTkFii4FO r1JFpSAmHSFvUYnMGF5ucppOG0iYNmLhs6Qamyb+v0RQXYZWWMuwZNjLqunVnKULgdnk 7R+4UkuLW3EadQDfpPSVITM3Om31DkSgvcInUFZBI5FD5Jgf59a2jExUpN9wTqToqImx FbZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DeR+7Sl+3Xwy/Xgv56orwp0zcR58krCB8G6tum5f5NQ=; b=UMXZ6ag4l4jA2OufzqCBaGUBh/N6bL7LFmQEryupKNN8tDnykMdejRX+GXUvJahx8D jTFSTMEvpJchTVOojYg2VwC5MeKl4ncNtulRb5X9I9yZM+Y3SSRtiph8AXClcE6mb3c4 X4bmheV7VTY11JHPDV5lJ9IeQFzm+AvCNdejChzxaOwtPxFE1U/E/LhTyeysTxfJnEgI yuGzxkNUlpswzL4inuoKMIFg4CLzucUajgvJhsucKc+5PmekPHLLB41I+XL00LOOSI7J ViysO9M0VZAEHYSrRCoaR1XTXGn8l7b96xU3R99uFcdINTbKj9Ei8kvUQ7bdPWpV0LUf XGZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4oOIBGPEeTQu5nfU+TMZAFMcjZ2QhjLceCHCo9mbkGNXXSbO66 ZGfTIFBrwWHxRmmbMCaXJKq0wgYwFS2fRbxxSM0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbNasQStbICsifmHzbTk1Fn9+Cxh/lhsKVHzLhqj9A8Af6I6acV44OhOeRbgNpoDKEdr+H8XoWi7ZAHN2r8uJE=
X-Received: by 10.84.129.73 with SMTP id 67mr12094048plb.198.1511762005706; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:53:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.187.2 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:53:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:53:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CADajj4by1L_h9SKunNhEOp+8qx5d7B3P-4YxTDFMZ7bjneVmZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1306c055cb9d055ef0859b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/A2oGBP5vBAAEWZ7CYYu2f-90dXs>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 05:53:31 -0000

Correcting email address.

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> This document describes how to leverage the Automatic Control Plane (ACP)
> in Automatic Networks (AN) to provide stable and secure connectivity for
> Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) processes. The document is
> intended to be *informational*.
>
> The document is well written and has an adequate Security Considerations
> section. I have no issues with this document. Minor nit: "encryption
> protected" -> "encrypted."
> --
> -- Magnus
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email