[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-ippm-delay-var-as-01

"David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Mon, 05 January 2009 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <secdir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secdir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370773A6942; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:01:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BE23A68A2 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:01:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.537
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id awpeGcEKe1g7 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:01:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from QMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8344B3A6887 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:01:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from OMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.51]) by QMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zs3k1a00116AWCUA9t1TNx; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:01:27 +0000
Received: from Harrington73653 ([24.147.240.21]) by OMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zt1Q1a00i0UQ6dC8St1R2w; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:01:26 +0000
From: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: secdir@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:01:23 -0500
Message-ID: <00eb01c96f57$3e7172b0$6905a8c0@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
thread-index: AclvVz0aZ6PyIeBkQjWxg7plkuT15g==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Cc: "'Benoit Claise (bclaise)'" <bclaise@cisco.com>, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, acmorton@att.com
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-ippm-delay-var-as-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: secdir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: secdir-bounces@ietf.org

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

Document: draft-ietf-ippm-delay-var-as-01
Title: Packet delay Variation Applicability Statement

I found no new security issues relevant to this document.

The document reads like a research paper, rather than IETF document,
but the nature of the discussion seems to call for this.

David Harrington
dbharrington@comcast.net
ietfdbh@comcast.net
dharrington@huawei.com

_______________________________________________
secdir mailing list
secdir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir