[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netconf-with-defaults

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 06 October 2010 00:35 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2BA3A709D for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.878
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.878 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.613, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kjjTeQPJgOtD for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CDA3A6ED7 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A65C201B0; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:36:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 9C30B41DD; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:36:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:36:24 -0400
Message-ID: <tslsk0kkvhz.fsf@live.suchdamage.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: draft-ietf-netconf-with-defaults@tools.ietf.org, netconf-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netconf-with-defaults
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:35:29 -0000

I've reviewed this document.  I see no issues as a secdir reviewer nor
any general issues I choose to raise.

This document defines how default values  are handled within netconf and
forces servers to adopt one of three strategies:

* Always expand default values into the configuration
** Always trim default values
* Indicate which values are default and which values have been set by a
*user

--Sam