[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06
Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com> Thu, 07 June 2018 19:58 UTC
Return-Path: <bew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB23131164; Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata.all@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152840153235.30652.4913197199283925939@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 12:58:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/FCPWEJwnO_feSz7topKoijNZLNg>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 19:58:53 -0000
Reviewer: Brian Weis Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The purpose of this document is to provide a history of changes that will be made to the next version of SCTP. The changes are comprised of resolutions to errata and referencing published extensions to SCTP that should be included in the next version of SCTP. There do no appear to be any security considerations to the errata or other text included in this Internet-Draft. I consider it Ready for publication.