[secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext-06
Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Mon, 24 September 2018 06:50 UTC
Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BB3130E51; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5C9BXfmct9sj; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x129.google.com (mail-it1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F632130DE7; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x129.google.com with SMTP id j81-v6so9120555ite.0; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4JbWCuVYtwRkJ87aSL138mMyNakB0Cjgv/Db0nx0AwU=; b=lU42Dmd4Ree+DmTHyPxEHYGVvyzj029sDvlWAJnD5JW7hjNDopx5+Crm1KZSe5WM+z 6WHuXbYvEZ37I99Iz6mIT99bglz4/ow/VKjdAfhzDsi7vFjNb1HsPNfCIQJSA1qAq7lP s1biNOe2RN4aB94ZQolCT+7J+kL91CAfv8FzkJFxftmxBLotvV/DIrfDOjekrQvTTUwx Di/bwRAT03hUPnW2xJHrrtJ5h5J06BCSwL3X7CRL3ENdeRXlYTHJmh8qUwHujZIEAtkA x7NZhDFGkaqx9at0SPeCluxJbgodJMY5tyzHkCutH2mLuda77pu3ungHUjHvDBGowdel rBXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4JbWCuVYtwRkJ87aSL138mMyNakB0Cjgv/Db0nx0AwU=; b=swy15dWxl55EFXxT9V9EpWNE0oxGimju+1OKHCerM22OkdEe5zc0lO47BvhlrfL9JH gXp/HxftpF/1ZNsO3+okdaqbdzOk/aNrEW2u2HKiMlctGZvE9A9dxtxaid+QyUXMyhxx Nax6tN5By/c8d+e0WnDJzukZE6kuqYuIPstKdIAQIndmVIWXqruMvIEBPvI705VAMtwn dTkAolP9HdWS0SoWfR+XcQmIYXIazaQ4cy0vO7EnSc5riyy4Z9t7MpiL76ntOrFLROyV eIvFH4kpLSAjr+g6Wne3216DVJW37rfOLr6TAwoArTzmpOE793+MaS8TAfkjMst2djZF Q0rQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51B7Qj3HsuYsNkOpxhaOBWNdq0hCxiM+YZyWSkCYIQAaP1WP4kan tJYH7S4xLrpIrm4bdZc+YjMNNb+/zGqZyWu4GtQiDQLw58w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYefEL2Tl/TjiGk3mNe96qN+WPa92lsfg4o39AshtnZcfnJ2W11JQs43uEY8Csza1J6NKUMJ5vSRGNB+2FVMJA=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:4502:: with SMTP id y2-v6mr8423587jaa.11.1537771803862; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 02:49:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHRbVKbGYigEOMPm-9GJcmAJC3aMiYN3efw748HH1yP=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext.all@ietf.org
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/HPtq9JjF6CkZ562t7FsLdZ3doao>
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext-06
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 06:50:07 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready. This draft extends FEC as per RFC 6363 to cover sliding encoding window based schemes as well as the original block based schemes. The reasonably thorough Security Considerations of RFC 6363, which are referenced, seem adequate. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com
- [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecfra… Donald Eastlake