Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-isis-trill

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Fri, 17 December 2010 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE08D3A6C2A; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:31:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.585, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zzMlGiFUoYXt; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBBC3A6C1D; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA0AC2016B; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:32:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id E558F4060; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:33:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com
References: <tslipywbakv.fsf@mit.edu> <tsl4oac15m0.fsf@mit.edu> <010701cb9e30$d17a1990$746e4cb0$@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:33:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <010701cb9e30$d17a1990$746e4cb0$@huawei.com> (Adrian Farrel's message of "Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:24:38 +0000")
Message-ID: <tslk4j8ythx.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-trill@tools.ietf.org, 'Sam Hartman' <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, ietf@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-isis-trill
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:31:58 -0000

>>>>> "Adrian" == Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com> writes:

    Adrian> Sam, Thanks for your work.

    Adrian> Can I clarify. You wrote:

> The first is that I think that draft-ietf-isis-trill does an adequate
    >> job of discussing the security implications of IS-IS on trill.
    >> I've read the security considerations section of
    >> draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-protocol and I think it doesn't do so
    >> either.

    Adrian> I you have one positive and one negative statement.  I think
    Adrian> you meant them to both be negative.  Perhaps you could
    Adrian> confirm.

You are correct.