[secdir] Secdir review of draft-farrresnickel-harassment
Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com> Wed, 04 February 2015 04:50 UTC
Return-Path: <magnusn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361561A1BF6 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 20:50:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cnz_mWBzY3Zd for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 20:50:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1628E1A1BEC for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 20:50:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id b13so48083101wgh.9 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 20:50:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oSgGm4DpaQeToTd7Ebybw5p6ktKkDL+bapdfm7SA38o=; b=05nubBfQQRTVUeVGMyRZEbQYZ1h39KJIGUppozgZPS52PdqwzZW2oLxDhXoTNyOsDN Xg76A1kR3RNlBASJdHMk3x9gusIDgnOu9JGKtOScipkrGa3O0l1Aa1+r9atqa1fYB40p NYEKJhJiu/pVDoNrUIrYL7mtSYTXJ9jk5/NbZMjAYosHG7kX+nRCIuXqTEE7Wl1J5nL3 gyDtYhcNu2xyUJoszLRwZTLgFVAp3DjSeCRz9GRMVyUb2J4BbbguT6/Wnm+5DqXNmBq2 P01Jzj0vNUxD5q1m08blZpd3G7pRay8sImHqaS6+/keHEVu6eEZ72QTHLPw+kgPaBjAN /1bQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.23.36 with SMTP id j4mr250460wif.69.1423025414863; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 20:50:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.189.139 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 20:50:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 20:50:14 -0800
Message-ID: <CADajj4Y=zkthGvt+eVY1g7bOu5RrrKJGZokkmBvSS3=6=4LK3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-farrresnickel-harassment@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f83a0595bfec1050e3bec95"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ObwAzkNBWLeVf5tBBiESticuBu0>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-farrresnickel-harassment
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:50:17 -0000
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. > These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area > directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > This memo documents processes for the IETF to solve harassment situations. > As such, it has no protocol security implications. > -- Magnus
- [secdir] Secdir review of draft-farrresnickel-har… Magnus Nyström