[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-pkix-ta-mgmt-reqs-05.txt

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> Mon, 23 August 2010 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <jhutz@cmu.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBF33A6AFF; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.441
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Es6thihdxx9L; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.srv.cs.cmu.edu (SMTP02.SRV.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.217.197]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA513A68B1; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LYSITHEA.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU (LYSITHEA.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.172.62]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp02.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o7NLHjSU025507 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:17:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:17:45 -0400
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pkix-ta-mgmt-reqs.all@tools.ietf.org
Message-ID: <77FA72B2BB70374598E2AA84@lysithea.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Scanned-By: mimedefang-cmuscs on 128.2.217.197
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-pkix-ta-mgmt-reqs-05.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:17:14 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This appears to be the requirements document that led to the just-
published RFC5934 (TAMP).  It seems pointless to review the requirements 
document at this late stage, when the protocol itself was completed so long 
ago that it is already a published RFC.  However, I gave it a brief skim 
and found nothing profoundly concerning.


-- Jerff