IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] sector review of draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection-07

"Prashanth Patil (praspati)" <praspati@cisco.com> Mon, 05 January 2015 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <praspati@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD5B1A3BA4; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 03:48:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MBMsiDLfPnc1; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 03:48:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 846301A3BA0; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 03:48:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=714; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1420458500; x=1421668100; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=mZtAIbd8V8zu1pTquAYpOowSKd+eLDp7/bOEZEJxHLM=; b=krccidWhZ7kn9HOPimgklZOV4TW1IejqQOflyWWkUxhhPO2DMuBib5az 6LPjqlEclPuTT6BsxFti/v8/jOHURS/Pd1amo5L7chvqWiIETSLdCc3dp MeuFdCSY4hIlUx5pZWFQ2uowLIxyrNAcJyHgbkFwMzhGF8mPGCN4jx9UR A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlAFAH95qlStJA2F/2dsb2JhbABcgwaBKgTDdogWAoEGFgEBAQEBfYQNAQEEeRACAQgYLjIlAgQOBYgsvHABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGY93B4QpAQSJIYR0iHORUCKDbm+BRX4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,698,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="110300508"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2015 11:48:19 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t05BmHJw013223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:48:17 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.7.100]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 05:48:17 -0600
From: "Prashanth Patil (praspati)" <praspati@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Thread-Topic: sector review of draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection-07
Thread-Index: AQHQKNiwAUxKUQpnyUK05uEkCW52tJyyKhAA
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:48:17 +0000
Message-ID: <D0D075D9.6AE37%praspati@cisco.com>
References: <0FD1DF78-8EEC-44F2-B715-9CD7405C07D6@cert.org> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330048DEF48@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <D0D03CAF.6AA02%praspati@cisco.com> <966E0D3C-815F-4131-91B1-FF0EF7568DFD@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <966E0D3C-815F-4131-91B1-FF0EF7568DFD@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117
x-originating-ip: [10.65.77.65]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <08FD59C941DC4847BF87B6A359D36F65@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/PPEmh5xw1jNcohRtit37fFJMMwk
Cc: "draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection.all@tools.ietf.org>, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] sector review of draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:48:21 -0000

Hi Ted,
I don¹t have a strong reason, we don¹t need to change it.

-Prashanth

On 1/5/15 4:43 PM, "Ted Lemon" <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

>On Jan 5, 2015, at 2:43 AM, Prashanth Patil (praspati)
><praspati@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Given that this is a recommendation for efficiency, we could perhaps
>> change 'SHOULD' to a 'MAY'.
>
>This would require a new WGLC.   I recommend against it: if the advice is
>good, it is good, and should be followed.   If it is not good, it should
>be removed.   The working group seemed to think it was good advice, so
>why change that now?   If you have a strong reason for changing it, I
>would of course support that, but I haven't heard one expressed.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email