[secdir] Secdir review of draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-00

Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A332129AE1; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:55:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQV3t3B_G2mJ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x231.google.com (mail-ua0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A154A129ADA; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 3so7678955uaz.3; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:55:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VY33MIUd7EEUW5f6Y33BerzsXZEpSwcg6WSYmgrtBaE=; b=MVPXF3eDrNUkRxjZdY0LXJna1dJA4KuPSY2Oriw2nqjyQ+oTvto1eJEATyKHF8fmIg Az+Q9xc+22ArLrKhB5Wm2ZK4vCBB6WHU9erM/FXnoCxYimGTQJfLrnqFE2tABuH0bAor j3u5H6qPXMFr1NjFmBYH8e4Cd1sD+gxaq/2TBA54rEMrJvKOmyjs3J0oJon9nGjLnYqK C7CMFDOqUZ1HOaXlrJkmrVBJqA5iSyth8nO8Iy2tnhh/1ta599CWGgGKnCE1NVd/e13D pq5VC7J0MyrqBuHoTfPK5KzxmcGh+eZLU7JzVSiEoB2vLnen+qf0ul/vJHLyifJW2oP/ C+VQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VY33MIUd7EEUW5f6Y33BerzsXZEpSwcg6WSYmgrtBaE=; b=jmz7mcOCHV9iAdqW/4+nQXX4LPY8B2Qwk8XCoLCn+C+KehJQVXGIMT04yCG9mvCjyz OY8Snz5OghdMCmWaw+yLjZ/Gxizwb46r6c8RiWDxSQo8n0ZMkT2iOh1ZEIGfbc/DFm87 NsknS0fMeln2QFhP/9EhfMfO/ujnxvwogkHkQTVNpCCxjwZMs2RlAlKWy2hq7srR9Qpv rbrC5fByhix8u3u9HLSCb24dBIO/636bGYT/ZpZv9CK5Z4gSjIcwfwJMbxdvM18ct3J9 UOKj8VWQf1hQumu3+TDHnnnNqqhT6oUoIj3MhnsL/6QMfefe8xKzreEZOXAMEPbRjGRU 2F6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKZGZTIWk6T61e9CvrRc1+R7+w2T7wca6DnlkYvRJKhepU/2G833YG2sa9WLNLcpaj1pEulQMi9M1zrhQ==
X-Received: by 10.176.68.68 with SMTP id m62mr135428uam.65.1481846101756; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:55:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.36.203 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:55:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:55:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFOuuo6B1ZUJkh1-tjJTvhm-GxJwtnW2LVLzLc5XQn221qJbdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114c14a481d05e0543bb2e3d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/RuKx6xrvxU3nPPEjDFHoA1jA2tI>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-00
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 23:55:04 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This very brief document simply notes that people have been using
unassigned BGP path attribute values, and thus "Per this document, IANA has
marked the BGP Path Attributes registry

   entries for values 30, 31, 129 as "deprecated"."


As the document correctly states, there are no security considerations for
this.

Radia