Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-klensin-idna-unicode-review-03

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Thu, 12 September 2019 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120631200DB; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HacSTQk3Yg0v; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E09E8120052; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1i8O7m-0001Xp-W7; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:22:58 -0400
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:22:53 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Patrik_F=C3=A4ltstr=C3=B6m?= <paf@netnod.se>
cc: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>, secdir@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, draft-klensin-idna-unicode-review.all@ietf.org
Message-ID: <207ED4272C9D49D9D036E412@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <46C2335D-4C9E-4D96-B799-D2EC329F670E@netnod.se>
References: <156816606075.22400.22167404102467671@ietfa.amsl.com> <645388ABB5D92E33447C55DF@PSB> <46C2335D-4C9E-4D96-B799-D2EC329F670E@netnod.se>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SbIXhFsrrWWYu7EiYy4Uky2T5YE>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-klensin-idna-unicode-review-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:23:04 -0000

Fixed in working draft.  Thanks.  And thanks to Christopher for
spotting this.
   john


--On Thursday, September 12, 2019 07:00 +0200 Patrik Fältström
<paf@netnod.se> wrote:

> On 12 Sep 2019, at 0:07, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
>>> - Section 3,
>>> second paragraph: s/full Unicode versions/major Unicode
>>> versions?
>> 
>> IIR, "full Unicode versions" is Unicode's preferred
>> terminology. We should check this.
> 
> I also thought it was "full" but when checking I see they call
> it "major":
> 
> <https://unicode.org/versions/>
> 
>    Patrik