[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-murchison-rfc8536bis-12
Vincent Roca via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 09 April 2024 14:02 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64421C14F60D; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 07:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-murchison-rfc8536bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.9.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <171267136639.39452.923786431000419885@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 07:02:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SkzpZqDD3VzemSg7G4xFjTg9H6w>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-murchison-rfc8536bis-12
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 14:02:46 -0000
Reviewer: Vincent Roca Review result: Ready Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: Ready I just have a minor comment regarding Section 6 "Security Considerations" and 7 "Privacy Considerations". The current draft briefly mentions RFC 7808 whereas this RFC has very detailed security and privacy sections and is a MUST READ. I suggest the authors refer to RFC 7808 in both sections for further security or privacy information in a convincing manner. Regards, Vincent
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-murchis… Vincent Roca via Datatracker