IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 03:31 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136AA12950F; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:31:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q8G10iSYElFr; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x236.google.com (mail-io0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C63B81295EF; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:30:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x236.google.com with SMTP id j65so393412009iof.0; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:30:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sFC+yJZQfOqn4LSXKjSFL2ciNhephrwv5/ig02Eyr+E=; b=tFz/AgaSmEcpSPzxz0hDaK0a7WL8wW8Sz4N3A7xZvltFxzyyFFxgGHdjgicCWhQX6b WV+25u4cX3sgKtMYLYgKfHkF44ii3jSyBZjPvdkugIWPLQ8OHQzF0hcjG+Lo24lWDEbu cKHKqSTawifDQ3xEpHlrMjkxh3VJAiipL3iDn9VZSVK48thH0LLGWnrPS23H2IIkkASv xL+5FAXtRDvwuP/J4uPa1n+MZqoSNKGtGd3J/GwNaELPJ7rPR4hvUDwQLQK10v2gmHoI 17qPmhOo1fU4OK8mP9O6Jol0JPqf0aZwsSjt9uOuSc0Yl29RqgkziHXY7WNX+d4C9U5Z vCGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sFC+yJZQfOqn4LSXKjSFL2ciNhephrwv5/ig02Eyr+E=; b=VrHXQaYc5hX/LkL0Q3ub9/Lo22jfQO/VAzDwf0sdyuRmpf4l0rooxWfEeozWcNdwqR BSgQe/yb92+NUd3JjHo873bsZ3EjONEEvHAd3UkusoEj2mfv8yoT3V2kbvUmvg9NW1QM evoonVaAiJYfdCE7zp12GMvIhkJsG/TLuysicQ6JPptMW/Ohk+irgW69hkjKj/H85yT5 ur9Z6xI7K5b62n/ImXQtWgehmcyAddxlG0oJwXTEJIBfiwtrAQ/4aCDcBl9Qjmi5rAWH IjgUS5P5+8R0m1g+fOCmiVF20H2T4VDCfTH0r8XRYKBLWUTTxt71gMXQ6t5aD6CfAhsL Y7jw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01cjAumKTImq8sHho5q2rVnXUpI40ZXdnox+V1sVnFvvnx0t7QzqMxPBhU9LNvz0sDi3gp6HBWT5sR+9g==
X-Received: by 10.202.196.150 with SMTP id u144mr19672114oif.190.1480563054103; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:30:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.236.37 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:30:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <583F6DDB.1070300@gmail.com>
References: <583F6DDB.1070300@gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 22:30:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA=duU1B_+tvP2s=dHcs5w9Dyen_mkYJ7n3pKgt2aU3pnyYNGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e4ad2e8565b0542907265"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/UEhEEt_o5L1vlOUwkmUIo0WPJ_E>
Cc: draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection.all@ietf.org, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 03:31:10 -0000

Chris,

Thanks for your review!

Cheers,
Andy
(PALS co-chair)


On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> I'm not familiar with this technology but the specification appears to
> address the security concerns. I like that the relevant RFCs for the base
> and associated protocols are each listed in the Security Considerations
> section.
>
> The document appears well written and I found no nits in my albeit brief
> review.
>
> Best regards,
> Chris
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email