[secdir] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07

"Shawn M. Emery" <semery@uccs.edu> Mon, 25 November 2019 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <semery@uccs.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2410120F44; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:31:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jgUfH9EWBMTL; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:31:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exchange.uccs.edu (uccs-ex1.uccs.edu [128.198.1.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 730E11208BF; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:30:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (209.85.208.51) by UCCS-EX1.uccs.edu (128.198.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:30:43 -0700
Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id b5so14343965eds.12; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:30:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUKzZWGqatz1iqEOMNQ5r4P0BVS72uT8QVuQblldHGy2nyiQ+SO WjtM44ydQOlE4zWtnMitU7CtFxVajb35CkrXZLM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy62aulwuFm07PFelK+XMq7YptFfnT+rF0PsBs33K92bcFphRGJjJwlKX4cVCdTZobbgRRCucMGzEA5EK8G7uo=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d496:: with SMTP id b22mr21384248edr.122.1574721042595; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:30:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Shawn M. Emery" <semery@uccs.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:30:31 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAChzXmaHQa8QgyzVHrV09Gj9UHSm7tEiEsG60EJmw-hQenUXEg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAChzXmaHQa8QgyzVHrV09Gj9UHSm7tEiEsG60EJmw-hQenUXEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d465605983350cd"
X-Originating-IP: [209.85.208.51]
X-ClientProxiedBy: uccs-ex1.uccs.edu (128.198.1.101) To UCCS-EX1.uccs.edu (128.198.1.101)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/UY6_dJ3tD0_CLBh4C0Lf1-mmxmE>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:35:39 -0800
Subject: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 22:34:30 -0000

Reviewer: Shawn M. Emery
Review result: Ready with nits

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

This draft specifies a YANG model for the Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (MPLS) Label Distribution Protocol (LDP).  Network
Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) and RESTCONF is used
to mange network devices based on this model.

The security considerations section does exist and for security
and privacy concerns, discusses that the MTI for NETCONF is
SSH and TLS for RESTCONF.  For authorization, NETCONF
and RESTCONF uses the Network Configuration Access Control
Model (NACM).

The section goes on to state that some data nodes
and RPC operations in the YANG module are considered sensitive
to various operations, but does not give guidance on which nodes
or subtrees that would be affected.  In the past, module specifications
that I've reviewed have outlined each of these relevant items.

The section finishes with the statement that the security
properties of the base specifications, LDP, LDP IPv6, etc., also applies
to this draft.  I agree with the above assertions.

General comments:

None.

Editorial comments:

s/into following/into the following/
s/means and be read/should be read/
s/family"/family"./
s/VPN Forwarding and Routing/VPN Routing and Forwarding/
s/provides a mean/provides a means/
s/Neibgbor/Neighbor/
s/pereference/preference/
s/creatable\/ deletable/creatable\/deletable/

RESTCONF should be expanded on first ocurence.

Shawn.
--