[secdir] secdir review of draft-dusseault-impl-reports-02
"David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Fri, 05 June 2009 17:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E003A6CC7 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.980, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yNw3BzxHTdwJ for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.96]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5A43A6B95 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0HFG1c00F0QuhwU59HXmqa; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:31:46 +0000
Received: from Harrington73653 ([24.147.240.21]) by OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0HXl1c00E0UQ6dC3NHXl3E; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:31:46 +0000
From: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:31:44 -0400
Message-ID: <02c701c9e603$7f223b50$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
thread-index: AcnmAz+Kk4PK1FiQTeKzEEoZhSMYEQ==
Cc: RjS@nostrum.com, ldusseault@commerce.net
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-dusseault-impl-reports-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:31:43 -0000
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document describes updates to existing processes for implementation and interoperability reports, and provides recommendations about the level of detail required. The document is about IETF standards process, is well written, and introduces no new security concerns. David Harrington dbharrington@comcast.net ietfdbh@comcast.net dharrington@huawei.com
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-dusseault-impl-re… David Harrington