[secdir] Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00
mundy@sparta.com Thu, 12 August 2010 04:03 UTC
Return-Path: <mundy@sparta.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D157A3A68CE; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rlxUG01QRKg6; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90843A689E; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id o7C44Ftu010485; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:04:16 -0500
Received: from mailbin2.ads.sparta.com (mailbin.sparta.com [157.185.85.6]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7C44Fs0024467; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:04:15 -0500
Received: from garfield.home.tislabs.com ([68.33.140.25]) by mailbin2.ads.sparta.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:04:14 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by garfield.home.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EB4A3B1B6; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:04:14 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:04:14 -0400
From: mundy@sparta.com
To: secdir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20100812000414356621.7dfd1394@sparta.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.9
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2010 04:04:14.0933 (UTC) FILETIME=[6D919050:01CB39D3]
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios.all@tools.ietf.org, mundy@sparta.com
Subject: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 04:03:40 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This draft provides the results of a technical survey of several ISPs about their actual or planned IPv6 deployment strategies. The document has an appropriate Security Considerations section which, essentially says, the document has no security impacts. Russ Mundy