[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lake-traces-07
Ivaylo Petrov via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 16 September 2023 17:54 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F383BC15109E; Sat, 16 Sep 2023 10:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ivaylo Petrov via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-lake-traces.all@ietf.org, lake@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 11.11.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <169488689598.20310.2907983251532754551@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylopetrov@google.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 10:54:55 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/XNnvYa_lI8EbGWIooii9NZ3YceM>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lake-traces-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 17:54:56 -0000
Reviewer: Ivaylo Petrov Review result: Ready Reviewer: Ivaylo Petrov Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I haven't verified the examples myself, but the rest looked good to me. Thank you for writing this document! I agree with Roman that the provided examples need to be consistent with I-D.ietf-lake-edhoc when that is published and this document should point to the resulting RFC.
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-la… Ivaylo Petrov via Datatracker