[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-roll-rpl-11

Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com> Wed, 01 September 2010 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <tena@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FD73A68E2; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.585, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uY9osyGs0lZJ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FF43A6358; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L810047QTEACZ@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:22:58 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L81009O8TEA76@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:22:58 +0800 (CST)
Received: from z00147053k ([10.70.39.122]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L810039PTE9AX@szxml04-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:22:57 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:22:57 +0800
From: Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, secdir-secretary@mit.edu, draft-ietf-roll-rpl@tools.ietf.org
Message-id: <44BCD8D277C6479097DB80AF063B4325@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=response
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1006030031110.25000@fledge.watson.org>
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-roll-rpl-11
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 03:25:27 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

This draft is well written. I only have two comments.

1. It is lack of manageability aspects to produce MIB;
2. Should be added flow examples for RPL;



B. R.
Tina
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/index.html