Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-behave-turn-13
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 11 March 2009 14:30 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0590A3A67D2 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.101, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vFzmClfAPhcq for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpout.capalon.com (smtpout.capalon.com [63.208.156.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0243A6817 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (viruscan [8.8.40.174]) by smtpout.capalon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6260578866E for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:21:13 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.4.5 (20070130) (Debian) at capalon.com
Received: from woodstock.binhost.com (woodstock.binhost.com [8.8.40.152]) by smtpout.capalon.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1285B78867C for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:20:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 16998 invoked by uid 0); 11 Mar 2009 14:30:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO THINKPADR52.vigilsec.com) (96.255.144.212) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2009 14:30:09 -0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:16:51 -0400
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, secdir@ietf.org
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06240803c5dd708c3db4@[10.20.30.158]>
References: <p06240803c5dd708c3db4@[10.20.30.158]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <20090311142053.1285B78867C@smtpout.capalon.com>
Cc: rohan@ekabal.com, philip_matthews@magma.ca, jdrosen@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-behave-turn-13
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:30:02 -0000
Does this mean MUST implement and SHOULD use? At 10:04 AM 3/11/2009, Paul Hoffman wrote: >I note that authentication in TURN is a SHOULD, not a MUST, but I >think that is reasonable for the expected deployment scenarios for TURN.
- [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-behave-turn-… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-behave-t… Russ Housley
- Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-behave-t… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-behave-t… Philip Matthews
- Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-behave-t… Philip Matthews