[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc3392bis-03
Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> Tue, 30 December 2008 23:52 UTC
Return-Path: <secdir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secdir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA9E3A687E; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:52:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADBC63A67C0 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:52:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tv-zy+mRnlx5 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (PCH.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.90]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE193A687E for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (pch.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id mBUNqQtY011000 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:52:26 -0500
Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu (FORT-POINT-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.76]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id mBUNqJlL010967 for <secdir@PCH.mit.edu>; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:52:19 -0500
Received: from mit.edu (W92-130-BARRACUDA-2.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.223]) by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id mBUNqDkx022180 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:52:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net (cyteen.hactrn.net [66.92.66.68]) by mit.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id AED6311913D1 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:51:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from thrintun.hactrn.net (thrintun.hactrn.net [IPv6:2002:425c:4242:0:219:d1ff:fe12:5d30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "thrintun.hactrn.net", Issuer "Grunchweather Associates" (verified OK)) by cyteen.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55F1B2846C; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from thrintun.hactrn.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by thrintun.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146B122808; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:51:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:51:50 -0500
From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Message-Id: <20081230235150.146B122808@thrintun.hactrn.net>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
X-BeenThere: secdir@mit.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
Cc: jgs@juniper.net, idr-chairs@tools.ietf.org, rchandra@sonoasystems.com
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc3392bis-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: secdir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: secdir-bounces@ietf.org
I have reviewed draft-ietf-idr-rfc3392bis-03 as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This is a clarification of RFC 3392, which was itself a clarification of RFC 2842, so this mechanism has been around for a while. Appendix B of the draft accurately describes the changes, to wit: In addition to minor editorial changes and updated references, this document also clarifies the use of the Unsupported Optional Parameter NOTIFICATION message and clarifies behavior when the Capabilities parameter is included in the OPEN message multiple times. I have no security concerns with this document. _______________________________________________ secdir mailing list secdir@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/secdir _______________________________________________ secdir mailing list secdir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir