[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05

Yoav Nir via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 16 February 2022 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767893A1687; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:14:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Yoav Nir via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.45.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <164504605737.5780.6077978787283129045@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:14:17 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_LUz3LDO8ZJJnH5Lc8sLcsh2V5Q>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 21:14:18 -0000

Reviewer: Yoav Nir
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The document is ready. It's concise and does just what it's supposed to,
nothing more. That's always good for security.

The security considerations section reads, "This document should not affect the
security of the Internet." I'd go even further and state that it in fact does
not affect the security of the Internet. Documents published by the RFC
editor's new model might, although they might affect it for the better as well
as for the worse.