IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 11 June 2013 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B8621F9A41; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.132, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uGqEg+KBmXSM; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B4A21F9A3D; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C09F24077; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:56:51 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vuCIefixkbWT; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:56:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.109] (pool-96-241-156-29.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.241.156.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9C1F24072; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:56:50 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-36--308928789"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930C049D6C6D@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:56:18 -0400
Message-Id: <F3C9D0B9-F46C-455F-B250-D3D2650DE2CE@vigilsec.com>
References: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930C049D6C6D@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
To: "Waltermire, David A." <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: "draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.all@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:56:26 -0000

Dave:

Thanks for taking the time to review it.

Russ


On Jun 11, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Waltermire, David A. wrote:

> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
>  
> This draft, a proposed update to RFC 2050, documents current policies and processes used in the Internet Numbers Registry System for the assignment of the Internet Protocol (IP) address space and autonomous system (AS) numbers. It does not propose any changes to the Internet Numbers Registry System.
>  
> After reviewing this informational document I do not have any security-related concerns.
>  
> Sincerely,
> Dave Waltermire
>  
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email