[secdir] draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-modp-dh-sha2 SECDIR review

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Thu, 24 August 2017 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BE3132710; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mukSb6JI0xef; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E00BA1326FE; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id r9so7507302oie.3; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ph11YgcVWe4c/xb9lGD8rSlQbmDuKhry+0wzDVASaQ8=; b=omUS1O/U0U0ClFXglPL2nM0YuXD/1cUNNGO8RmatggITwhzYDoV1KmhQFn7u4U1wRu Rgeo9FIAgfH0S8NOHgPFV/u65PS+aEs+rhOrqG5gvuPc3LKF0QCFM7aVTZToM7wveNUN /gKLxBhC+zvkXMQWlw1kcNuVSMEUKa2d5Le0WJjylMiV61EezggNy+DT1WGf8OGxbWI0 8iqwmvbFgXL2AXuJELpdlsFgAwwJuHoPLUABVj4RXuNpa6Sh4rECvsP/SlhLSiSSettS j+7mAMN43hG/XMtRRTMFYwxURGa1NbLEmT5qzyY0Ud3vrFC3ZiKXpslT18QHzbz8Vvpa S2Zw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ph11YgcVWe4c/xb9lGD8rSlQbmDuKhry+0wzDVASaQ8=; b=QEUsiXlJBqYL8338TvefUIQu1Xcb/qkEfGIiLOYatEzYPZ9YjDWMO7Y6CILeoKKiW8 WZt/mYca+1TqPAdhVLJcL24NcWyIhGOJ9l6BmbzdejfcN15MNLsRUp48g9TvUnD+KSBn +FP7AK1B0nTxO6K2NHkF84jAvlpU2hOLN5l48UmlcMSXGF1qeFy2DYyEgHXFq7K3W1v0 cZ4as5GWm153C+SkaUBlYfSP905nYhxY1JskzJgD4wZ9kgQTcW0MigtqM+9o+ML7j2HC REFgQdBQmupeht3IwirWF89U2t12vlbhSDnKlv14QM7PFtXknG5Hed0hD4wzwSWnLzBs +w7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5h/TMLQlWdwzNvFJ5V/St0lARslLaUHQWj7Jr1oxbdoThUqQjPu vlS6B7n2zKpH36Xff044dCthxgMPqJ1DrHM=
X-Received: by 10.202.242.2 with SMTP id q2mr9544118oih.71.1503613589167; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.168.183.10 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:26:13 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEEmMSWzuK050Pf2ytCF0hwpHJwDfENStFaYDe+Z_4bVkQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-modp-dh-sha2@ietf.org
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/aCBFfM6t_rbYelnwJZiySzVczrw>
Subject: [secdir] draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-modp-dh-sha2 SECDIR review
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:26:31 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready.

I am not an expert on MODP groups or the like but this document looks
good to me.

I would comment that I am used to information about where comments on
the draft should be sent being on the title page rather than on page 3
at the end of Section 1.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com