[secdir] draft-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not-03
<kathleen.moriarty@emc.com> Tue, 14 December 2010 02:46 UTC
Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty@emc.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D045128C137; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:46:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JrOCVrfGedSV; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:46:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F90928C0CF; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:46:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI03.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.23]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id oBE2mJWm022899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:48:19 -0500
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.221.251]) by hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:48:13 -0500
Received: from mxhub05.corp.emc.com (mxhub05.corp.emc.com [128.221.46.113]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id oBE2lEwf020730; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:47:14 -0500
Received: from mx06a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.172]) by mxhub05.corp.emc.com ([128.221.46.113]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:47:13 -0500
From: kathleen.moriarty@emc.com
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, all@tools.ietf.org
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:47:12 -0500
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not-03
Thread-Index: AcubOTU4L7w32XawTbC9rA16pwoFHg==
Message-ID: <AE31510960917D478171C79369B660FA0DAD7F515F@MX06A.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:42:30 -0800
Cc: tim.polk@nist.gov
Subject: [secdir] draft-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:46:43 -0000
Hello, draft-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not-03 looks good from a security perspective. My only question is to ask if the document should list out any previously published RFCs that contain references to use TLS or at least those that contain TLS v2? I reviewed a similar one for Sean last month and it did contain references. Thanks, Kathleen
- [secdir] draft-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not-03 kathleen.moriarty