[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-evrc-nw-08
Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Wed, 12 December 2012 00:19 UTC
Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765AF1F0CB5; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:19:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xx+IovnlFx+b; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658BD1F0CB0; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:19:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ANT06832; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:19:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:18:55 +0000
Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:19:40 +0000
Received: from DFWEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.39]) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.203]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:19:34 -0800
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-avt-rtp-evrc-nw@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avt-rtp-evrc-nw@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-evrc-nw-08
Thread-Index: AQHN1/5c/yyg2dDpA0eWwHiqaZjy0w==
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:19:33 +0000
Message-ID: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A815B2D07D@dfweml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <50C6EC73.9020505@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50C6EC73.9020505@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.193.34.95]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-evrc-nw-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:19:43 -0000
Dear all, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I see nothing to add from a security point of view. The document appears to be ready to go. Thank you, Tina