IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Mon, 24 August 2020 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180783A0CC4 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rpczt8xFaxAn for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3081A3A0CC1 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 07OLV5HI017634; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:31:05 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu 07OLV5HI017634
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1598304666; bh=5AmdrcqFfd834JsSeb1sZPBgW2hn+LvGEqVv57W4pX8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YHWtHVu9J71wILI/eyXMR2Dp0tBTofNb7lLTPC0zec9K1oe4ksI0NSgFciVzrb2op DdZXyIpGcI8bLwZzbg6tnYQVxnhKliuto2dCzcU6Psx3p5MpyQfM3huvuVnKQgQ2EG 8evUwOLdT4xb6fLMLlZ27xUsQLP2cLih5yfsqleQ=
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (morris.ad.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.46]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 07OLV4Al040836; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:31:04 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:31:03 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb]) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb%13]) with mapi id 15.01.1979.003; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:31:03 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04
Thread-Index: AQHWY70XU77VA9/k+kyxXuT6xqYWp6lH85lg
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:31:03 +0000
Message-ID: <828c2d017dc64e63bf607321dd18ad46@cert.org>
References: <CAFOuuo6VKmiB92u2+oYo+uzLkKrdExE+Y_2cYjHO50qf1QhuJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFOuuo6VKmiB92u2+oYo+uzLkKrdExE+Y_2cYjHO50qf1QhuJw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.203.1]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_828c2d017dc64e63bf607321dd18ad46certorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/bd1muV3MAAiVefsNqex-rgyzR6A>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:31:12 -0000

Hi Radia, thank you for this review!

I had nothing else to add from what was already noted here and by my peer ADs.

Thanks,
Roman



From: iesg <iesg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Radia Perlman
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 10:24 PM
To: secdir@ietf.org; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision.all@ietf.org
Subject: Secdir review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.



Summary: I have found no issues with the document.

This document specifies the extensions necessary to allow advertising IPv4 NLRI or VPN-IPV4 NLRI with an IPv6 next hop address.


The document is fine.



Nit: I didn't quite understand a word in the acknowledgement section

"  The authors would like to thank Francois Le Faucheur and Eric Rosen

   for the edition and their work on [RFC5549<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5549>]."

What do you mean by "edition"?  Do you perhaps mean "editing work"?

Would you still be properly acknowledging them if you removed the words "the edition and", and made it simply "for their work

on RFC5549"?



Radia

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email