Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers-guide-05.txt

Barry Leiba <leiba@watson.ibm.com> Fri, 10 October 2008 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <secdir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secdir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473C73A67F5; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27993A684F for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.262
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.262 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.337, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vpLheP0YG9kc for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (PCH.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.90]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB0C3A67F5 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (pch.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m9AIiQxU001730 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:44:26 -0400
Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu (FORT-POINT-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.76]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m9AIiOD4001726 for <secdir@PCH.mit.edu>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:44:24 -0400
Received: from mit.edu (M24-004-BARRACUDA-2.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.112]) by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id m9AIiG1l017764 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:44:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mit.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7BF68131E290 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:43:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9AIhsDr012434 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:43:54 -0400
Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m9AIhrAP202260 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:43:53 -0600
Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m9AIhq2I008876 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:43:53 -0600
Received: from poplar (poplar.watson.ibm.com [9.2.24.140]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9AIhpwK008791; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:43:52 -0600
Received: from Uranus-009002042072.watson.ibm.com ([9.2.42.72]) by poplar.watson.ibm.com (IMF.2005.07.16.1050.haw) with SMTP ID IMFd1223664234.1010; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:43:54 -0400
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:43:49 -0400
From: Barry Leiba <leiba@watson.ibm.com>
To: Charlie Kaufman <charliek@microsoft.com>, "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, secdir@mit.edu, jdrosen@cisco.com, dean.willis@softarmor.com
Message-ID: <87A21710058345B08EC77984@Uranus-009002042072.watson.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <F009AC6CE159924ABD1E8B51049B9B5C6D60AE814C@NA-EXMSG-C103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <F009AC6CE159924ABD1E8B51049B9B5C6D5FDBAC70@NA-EXMSG-C103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE29180023B0A13@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <F009AC6CE159924ABD1E8B51049B9B5C6D60AE814C@NA-EXMSG-C103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
X-BeenThere: secdir@mit.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers-guide-05.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: secdir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: secdir-bounces@ietf.org

> That should probably be mentioned in the introduction. Is that concept cleared
> with the RFC Editor? Generally, RFCs can't reference I-Ds, but clearly in this
> case that's what you want.

Standards-track RFCs can't mention I-Ds normatively.  This is not on the 
standards track, nor are the references normative.

Barry

_______________________________________________
secdir mailing list
secdir@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/secdir
_______________________________________________
secdir mailing list
secdir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir