[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-calext-rscale-03

"Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> Sat, 14 February 2015 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8961A1B38; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:37:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.497
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A-kpC0HGGEHy; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.nict.go.jp (ns1.nict.go.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:232:300::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AF361A1B07; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:37:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw1.nict.go.jp (gw1.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.250]) by ns1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id t1E8bXmg017860; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:37:33 +0900 (JST)
Received: from TakeVaioVJP13 (ssh.nict.go.jp [133.243.3.49]) by gw1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id t1E8bXgn017857; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:37:33 +0900 (JST)
From: "Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
To: <draft-ietf-calext-rscale.all@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:37:41 +0900
Message-ID: <05dd01d04831$7f1feb20$7d5fc160$@nict.go.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AdBIMOOiaLelG4CVQLmmb8T68PWZdA==
Content-Language: ja
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at zenith1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/cp7krZMWtHD1Q06SD8Zv0TGH0Io>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, calext-chairs@tools.ietf.org, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-calext-rscale-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:37:38 -0000

Hello,

I have reviewed current version of this document as part of the security
directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any
other last call comments.

[overview]
This draft provides an extension to iCalender to support use of
non-Gregorian recurrence rules.
It first elaborates the difficulties to cope with the non-Gregorian calendar
using the existing "CALSCALE" property in iCalendar.
The "RRULE" property is thus extended to include an "RSCALE" element.
The draft also explains how to handle the dates expressed by non-Gregorian
calendar.

[security consideration check]
The security consideration section says that this draft does not introduce
any additional security concerns beyond those described in RFC 5545, 5546,
and 4791.
I agree, since this draft simply added an "RSCALE" element; I do not think
it may cause any extra security concerns.

[status]
I think this draft is ready for further process.

Thank you.
Take