Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04

Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 13 March 2020 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4CE3A0B3E; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3AV1U5pfVkU6; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22a.google.com (mail-oi1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FDCB3A0B68; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id p125so9759040oif.10; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=rzKVYiAyZRd/tDw1mfAL0LKdpGQWUcTzYlC0sCNMWms=; b=SHpPwkQjNpMCu1REmSnuI3eCa+BxAEeIA7jO+o6rtpb4jxdWH9+mAgH3yPOqiRg49a HeNYAfDyTZybr8YuVK1xBTgyu7o1IouLpkZlHyzd3+ztqslNA0BChSd4X5syCaI3aoKn kcIdd/Jb6ozUQjPFa+73qoSmQXdngPxwVEDdDuzVObCsC1PF2HdF5c7ptidKq2gvCftj RKcVx6tpQ9dixO2OghJr3FSgD/xuxruF2NhF2mbn2uhIa8CO16S4y+GPKwfisGl/gFqB aqeJqVeS6BsXAcq51DEDCHDO1wGFAeljjZbNScGHw+uHdNZUdzVw74zdzJ23kP+mLn95 Sn9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=rzKVYiAyZRd/tDw1mfAL0LKdpGQWUcTzYlC0sCNMWms=; b=ArHlraQmclN/mAhy0OXcTmj1JDHyvm9e6P9HYkAiVZZIizPhu00VQ0SHr3GPUPyA9x WUjKZJf6h+gFyK/4fWysNsOeGhRyYqJ6LwYO9XS7a0GxT4VNj53SFQEycpa0AsfV43Zl 1oUVAdcxPeG2M1Zk8giYfI2uR/h4kQyc8NqTFoMNCb/bGt323md16Tf3bckxqd0nr7jB RRVkstCP3NGmWrniY2+Xs59n2A15+KwPUN/d/XP5XAQ16dHRjiLkQhVPI+NtantJx3st D5smIqMtHsHSVL1zKc6gWP9dw1bo9Eu6WiIfWtZ3zxOlOnLb2BcomTK5rOuGaHKY2xJk olkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1Vczm3uJGTXV2o/ppOQUkMb2Yj2vrnkhmQ6nsfxkteC9Cv4C7C umaqcHxMI0M9Qup5N5HB2fxHulc/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuMVkN80OQNAUuE87cu9SPy//AUtUNIFmTX9ppHtdWJQ052sIFyX/4B1DY4xKDeMoigmPgEcw==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c390:: with SMTP id t138mr2167951oif.117.1584113482889; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Chriss-Air.lan (69-4-52-8.dsl.frcn.hctcnetworks.net. [69.4.52.8]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m6sm2179276oic.7.2020.03.13.08.31.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework.all@ietf.org, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
References: <800b9d7a-f510-85a9-b1a0-63ff114c8723@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1d756ed5-1c58-17f4-ffcc-f0033e912648@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:31:16 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <800b9d7a-f510-85a9-b1a0-63ff114c8723@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/iHpJZFgzOaE2MWH6kwx1RhL2d4A>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:31:29 -0000

Oops - sorry. Resending to the correct alias.

Thanks,

Chris

On 3/13/20 8:26 AM, Chris Lonvick wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
> IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
> security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> The summary of the review is Ready with Issues. The only reason I add 
> the "with Issues" caveat is that the Security Considerations section 
> broadly defers to I-D.ietf-detnet-security.
>
> The Security Considerations section of 
> draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework additionally provides some 
> comments that are specific to the draft. I found those to be well 
> thought out and appropriate. I skimmed I-D.ietf-detnet-security and 
> found it to also be well thought out. The threat model was clear and 
> understandable and the document appeared to appropriately address the 
> threat analysis.
>
> I would give draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework an unqualified 
> Ready, as soon as I-D.ietf-detnet-security is reviewed and becomes an 
> RFC.
>
> Regards,
>
> Chris
>