[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Sun, 17 March 2024 19:33 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEB2C14F601 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E-giFokicPdP for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BF25C14F5E4 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dhcp-97a7.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.151.167]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 95056207EB; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net 95056207EB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1710704033; bh=ZfExKWzReW7pjRV46ME/eBfhCn18j4Or1d8Z7K9J6J4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=Bht0G7F8pa/H6g9Xv5Q7mRHnG6iKPzbCE1dVkr5ucLHkHpZWA3DFsAVFpfaWGhZcu iNJXprDYVnVVIDCiEMdE9kdlMGrEr1WeNBy+7mkCG4KESemzew5FqPu1sQczu4npv6 nm63F4PBFSbUyowu4b0PsmWfgiYG0Embs8rATJpg=
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: secdir@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa.all@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:33:50 -0700
Message-ID: <ybl34sod55t.fsf@wx.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/kHD-SRBh7S86tmhRxtfRMW8A8XY>
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 19:33:58 -0000
Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-13 Reviewer: Wes Hardaker Review Date: 2024-03-15 Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I reviewed the diffs since my last early review in May of 2023, and found that the authors did some good architecture of the text ordering which helped address my concerns at the time. Thanks for adding the additional details to the document. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-segmen… Wes Hardaker