[secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-20
"Tobias Gondrom" <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Sun, 26 February 2017 15:03 UTC
Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B85129462; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:03:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org header.d=gondrom.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0E2luIxl2whh; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:03:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gondrom.org (www.gondrom.org [5.35.241.16]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33F231204D9; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:03:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from seraph (unknown [103.70.220.18]) by gondrom.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 784C564899; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:03:42 +0100 (CET)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=lsQk81XtGFo0sme5FpyAYUy6Mh/hZ6YwEf0z08+URfnxpkK6G6wulxUmP6aaw6d29t2LCMzRkPBWcviICPVeMTJX4556uL9N7/RmArvWldrvzkvtPFKMtz1CqJ4hdK7SVZcEPU+KrpoUnCXgVHX4SX4XBq2IhBJ3hxAIJLhKGwo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language;
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
To: 'secdir' <secdir@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 23:03:31 +0800
Message-ID: <022e01d29041$84daee20$8e90ca60$@gondrom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_022F_01D29084.93007810"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdKQP7C3F07hiElCR1SP8L/pQN7qtg==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/kMI758b5QKhdWz7PY5g4aeGjeZA>
Cc: 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: [secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-20
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:03:48 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-20: Uniform Resource Names (URNs) Updates: 2141, 3406 Intended status: Standards Track IMO the document is ready for IESG approval. I have no further additions or comments. Section 6.4.4. Security and Privacy covers security and privacy concerns mostly by referencing considerations from RFC6943, 3552 and 6973. Overall, I think it is sufficient. I also noted the shepherd document with regard to the overall working group consensus on this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn/shepherdwr iteup/ Best regards, Tobias
- [secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc21… Tobias Gondrom