Re: [secdir] [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-10.txt
Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl> Thu, 28 April 2022 07:16 UTC
Return-Path: <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F63C159524; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.092
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bbhmail.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22fEX01TY_6B; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.26]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AC75C159522; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omf20.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCB31C9D; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:16:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: stokcons@bbhmail.nl) by omf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 476F120025; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:16:00 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:16:00 +0200
From: Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
To: anima@ietf.org, Ops Dir <ops-dir@ietf.org>, Gen Art <gen-art@ietf.org>, Secdir <secdir@ietf.org>
Cc: Draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join Proxy <draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy@ietf.org>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
Reply-To: stokcons@bbhmail.nl
Mail-Reply-To: stokcons@bbhmail.nl
In-Reply-To: <2c575af0daabe6926b21bf7bf349927e@bbhmail.nl>
References: <164992113612.2596.15268456223727721242@ietfa.amsl.com> <2c575af0daabe6926b21bf7bf349927e@bbhmail.nl>
Message-ID: <0adcd6984ebea1fe9fd2e2d6cb74515a@bbhmail.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@bbhmail.nl
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_68c14c0b327f07d04679ccbf1eec8ea5"
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 476F120025
X-Stat-Signature: 8siqssmypakbot1drwbwsxucrya679h5
X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout05
X-Session-Marker: 73746F6B636F6E73406262686D61696C2E6E6C
X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+qowCmwnWDRGSi5ZRcUV/6pmUtdck+jM8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bbhmail.nl; h=mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-type; s=key; bh=9rgJv7CalU9/wG0DxycUvg2Uvgzy53EH1StTwgZugLw=; b=CoRDNTSxe8OG19Bnopc5jtQSJKplDlVX3sb2ERJJH/pk6KYjhsy7M+lvL6fmWbgt9m1Lb/gjrrUIp75zqkJhPjVdaD801/jq4X4V6EWoN62LNScr5AhPPX052rAiEnO2ANGISOkPTCAApkasfZo2T2caJiEmjW70BPS8L+jR2Fw=
X-HE-Tag: 1651130160-999843
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/m0TD_gYgEygkkTDwvV1SoJrKHl0>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-10.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:16:08 -0000
Dear reviewers, Can you verify that the recently published version 10 of the constrained-join-proxy draft correctly addresses your reviews as discussed on the mailing list? many thanks, greetings, Peter Peter van der Stok schreef op 2022-04-14 09:28: > This version 10 includes the results from SECDIR, OPSDIR, IANA, and > GENART reviews. > > Peter > internet-drafts@ietf.org schreef op 2022-04-14 09:25: > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model >> and Approach WG of the IETF. >> >> Title : Constrained Join Proxy for Bootstrapping Protocols >> Authors : Michael Richardson >> Peter van der Stok >> Panos Kampanakis >> Filename : draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-10.txt >> Pages : 24 >> Date : 2022-04-14 >> >> Abstract: >> This document extends the work of Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key >> Infrastructures (BRSKI) by replacing the Circuit-proxy between Pledge >> and Registrar by a stateless/stateful constrained Join Proxy. The >> constrained Join Proxy is a mesh neighbor of the Pledge and can relay >> a DTLS session originating from a Pledge with only link-local >> addresses to a Registrar which is not a mesh neighbor of the Pledge. >> >> This document defines a protocol to securely assign a Pledge to a >> domain, represented by a Registrar, using an intermediary node >> between Pledge and Registrar. This intermediary node is known as a >> "constrained Join Proxy". An enrolled Pledge can act as a >> constrained Join Proxy. >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy/ >> >> There is also an htmlized version available at: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-10 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-10 >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at >> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Anima mailing list >> Anima@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > Anima@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
- Re: [secdir] [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima… Peter van der Stok