Re: [secdir] [precis] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-07

Hi Matt, thanks for the review - it's much appreciated.

Just so you know: through discussion of Daniel Migualt's secdir review
of 7700bis (we're progressing them all together this time!), I realized
that it might be help to add another example of visually confusing
characters to 7564bis, so I plan to mention CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER A
U+0430 vs. LATIN SMALL LETTER A U+0061 (which will be more familiar to
readers than the Cherokee characters already in the document).

Peter

On 6/13/17 9:13 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Reviewer: Matthew Miller
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should
> treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-07
> Reviewer: Matthew A. Miller
> Review Date: 2017-06-13
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-13
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-07-06
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This document is ready to be published as a Standards Track document.
> 
> This document defines a framework application protocols use to
> prepare, compare, and enforce conformance of internationalized strings.
> It obsoletes RFC 7564.
> 
> This document is well written, and reinforces the security concerns
> discussed in Section 12 with references in the most relevant sections
> throughout the document.  While much of it essentially proclaims
> "be aware herein be dragons", the arguments for not proscribing more
> are well laid out.
> 
> Major Issues:  NONE
> 
> Minor Issues: NONE
> 
> Nits: NONE
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> precis mailing list
> precis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
> 