[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-pim-sm-linklocal-09

Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com> Tue, 01 December 2009 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <bew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7763A699C; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:09:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HuefhRPos4Ok; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFF43A682C; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAJAiFUurRN+K/2dsb2JhbADAc5gehDEE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,323,1257120000"; d="scan'208";a="112342593"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2009 22:09:44 +0000
Received: from dhcp-128-107-163-97.cisco.com (dhcp-128-107-163-97.cisco.com [128.107.163.97]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB1M9ide029153; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:09:44 GMT
Message-Id: <6D9E638B-DF8A-47FB-A555-EF928E09F513@cisco.com>
From: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:09:39 -0800
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: draft-ietf-pim-sm-linklocal@tools.ietf.org, pim-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-pim-sm-linklocal-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:09:52 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's  
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the  
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the  
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat  
these comments just like any other last call comments.

I had previously reviewed -06. I've evaluated the diffs for all of the  
successive drafts and have no further comments. I believe it is ready  
for publishing.

Brian