[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-sipping-service-identification-03

Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com> Tue, 08 September 2009 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD22F3A68D8; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.476
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L4e8eGpm6O7y; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f201.google.com (mail-yx0-f201.google.com [209.85.210.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763803A6767; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxe39 with SMTP id 39so6051642yxe.18 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lHJbqltgzAMM1f93LVQm9qgWcApKmpxs76D5t8UeEIg=; b=mSURphhEPwjJ+jQmevGzJbOXXF6LNvgiIk9znzmR9wm/5NpTTq+h76pAtGgwhGyTK1 OYEuwmMAtpOIt7lUuAoMlTIqgJhgOzBmeowBPtkhfCNsOiATQZXzU65cWI3Zr0TI2Y+5 0A2Fq0nlFqqcGFUmVX8TlNZm7QfXCqSFbdskM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; b=EzYQeO8DtngNVPZryhtQcuWirOFz47lliFwj/GAALwvMkApOAlJFBpwhwOGO2xsBet kSVQr5bNwrreAq44jisQ9c583O5OGEKHWJBg/kGX59MDwDrYsCoxt3Ihn7AM1cBFdhMg /u2yC7NZpG3nBtCmv2hopdERyvBprEZ+uBIPs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.107.2 with SMTP id f2mr26186153ybc.188.1252423865609; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:31:05 -0400
Message-ID: <6c9fcc2a0909080831pfc1a77fy8203ee0b4ab08cb1@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: sipping-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-sipping-service-identification@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-sipping-service-identification-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: barryleiba@computer.org
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:30:40 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

I was asked to review this document because I'd reviewed
draft-drage-sipping-service-identification some time ago.  Only, this
document doesn't derive from that one, but, rather, from
draft-rosenberg-sipping-service-identification, and it has none of the
issues I had with the other document.

I find this one useful and enlightening, and a good contribution to
the informational stream about SIP.  No issues, from a secdir point of
view or otherwise.

-- Barry Leiba