IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Mon, 07 June 2021 12:00 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788C13A12B0; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 05:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sT2g16ichO3M; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 05:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A09B03A129D; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 05:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id e17so17950853iol.7; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 05:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vRs1gc0GLC9dxZwPTcQtaltYSxYuDZGPvNyPWg26yEc=; b=ZF7F//8F04za0fH2J516Ays7PzWuSTFeN5iwWDFO1gN20Me6QtFqM5TOjZRNPzQrzp qLI48w3HG5s/FcqFZK2z9uJ7gfnHmL+4wkZRM4G8x+aYy7zn6tsIjLlBLMSvf26lHOcU 7yxZq00sPm8XbSpo3zEnCgxnubnVDQ2uThnyXyxcAVFju8GMHi14eqbhzO4ro9h1bvjn Zs8yMb5dUlnbB6LNALEBcHwY5+sU1V9zmFOlfoaACpKJ1w3mrPde3wAmbrj+klp8keQX 6TO092LFDO76y72LwxMAnq7lQaKwze0WFFYgsbokOVJqsY35J6sKg+5k5ZUvHD59RZvo zSdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vRs1gc0GLC9dxZwPTcQtaltYSxYuDZGPvNyPWg26yEc=; b=VAUf9nvcwKYN78Z2r2P7rkUz+2c1nM4I6oKrHCP2HYl7qiU5vH0zsHAPZxfov4t+I4 y8rs0iUKRQzhLBGAIgoC9mtoiI0Lo0phMhENAeSY/MQUU5EfK2ZLW7mBmu5xQKTxaZUN BB57Ien8rv2MGPiJLZgY+4Qi7qNu4hXCvL297fuBvzqWpwMFRVAt8G1Q7BBDw9lCsy3S MAsyQMb6Nywzewv77XaLHMalEaztqYOHl/nb291Q4W526efjSRiME59epiHO5ZqiJasS A7Hg91u+NYZwMz7/sbMP4fJQuGWBYK3zdoZW8xHSjlfCtg6otGSOVw7fLOzMticyNivr kwkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310GxDwrSiyC8X7j+ehUwrTela4Qj0WV2gOgxq75LJSARthWQlD LQy5xuOyRbFxax0gqt+cLvcAvdezDl6eQfJ1l8DCLrty
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxK/ivWEP9mIg5YghY2dSWyI84NHS6H87Gslw9230g3hn8imqyqdouOv74YCu6GGzYeAn3PP9zpcfRKNV5QoO4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:144a:: with SMTP id l10mr15687678jad.50.1623067205393; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 05:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF4+nEFZTWqAE+N8bf5PbTtL=-FSzXqJrJnPPaXvzbatX7z0xA@mail.gmail.com> <20210607085342.GA30635@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20210607085342.GA30635@nic.fr>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 07:59:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEGsmrj0L+d9wgTP3BrzLPar4_uigd+y6O3ChQ3fb5FYaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
Cc: secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/mdZkCOJQ3loic2JdZnXLsM5l36Y>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 12:00:22 -0000

Dear Stephane and Viktor,

There is a reason I put a smiley face after my comment about AAAA. I
think the use of A is adequately motivated by text in the draft.

Stephane: I'm not sure why the review was not marked as done but it is
so marked now.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:53 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 04:18:59PM -0400,
>  Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote
>  a message of 45 lines which said:
>
> > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> > IESG.
>
> There is apparently some glitch on the datatracker since your review
> is marked as not done yet
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis/reviewrequest/14679/>.
>
>
> > One wonders if/when it might be better to use AAAA as the substitute
> > QTYPE for minimized queries rather than A  :-)
>
> There are two reasons to use A (probably the biggest changed since RFC
> 7816):
>
> - minimize the risk of failure with broken middleboxes choking on
> QTYPE they don't know,
> - since the whole goal is privacy, you're more lost in the crowd with
> A requests.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email