Re: [secdir] secdir review

Dave Burke <daveburke@google.com> Sun, 08 February 2009 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <daveburke@google.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345793A6AAA for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:51:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.990, BAYES_20=-0.74, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Y8fg4xDT2T9 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:51:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.33.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AED3A68AE for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:51:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spaceape12.eur.corp.google.com (spaceape12.eur.corp.google.com [172.28.16.146]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n18LpbKr018022 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:51:37 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1234129897; bh=0yyXqDtYe3llNJApTFGFkigXGJs=; h=DomainKey-Signature:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type:X-GMailtapped-By: X-GMailtapped; b=hyvClt0mciIdXlrCRyi+DaseVMGPW0DYWecLapEznTvXYIXD6 oRPl/RHWDf/A/sI2J7dhbNGMGqycET4Z+WGyg==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:x-gmailtapped-by:x-gmailtapped; b=x8gMnIhqgdvA2BsCw4MKiti1RbdGVtjUbkYaoCYyWU3g91+fKxKiBxuO0NoQqSE1r NwsudLt8+hSSpkLX611Fg==
Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rndk57.prod.google.com [10.38.137.57]) by spaceape12.eur.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n18LpVjq018370 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:51:32 -0800
Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k57so1260178rnd.13 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:51:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.49.8 with SMTP id b8mr2119371ybk.135.1234129890625; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:51:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p06240813c5a7e64e51fe@128.89.89.71>
References: <p0624080cc59aaaf16165@128.89.89.71> <6e608abf0901270754s5b16274fgeb6092f840baf82d@mail.gmail.com> <p06240813c5a7e64e51fe@128.89.89.71>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:51:30 +0000
Message-ID: <6e608abf0902081351y2458ad56x55ab9d5460aa2939@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Burke <daveburke@google.com>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0015174c0e8cbcca9904626f4135"
X-GMailtapped-By: 172.28.16.146
X-GMailtapped: daveburke
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:18:15 -0800
Cc: secdir@core3.amsl.com, Mark.Scott@genesyslab.com, jon.peterson@neustar.biz
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:51:44 -0000

I've updated draft-ietf-mediactrl-vxml-04 (just posted to the I-D
respository) addressing your comments. For convenience, I've attached the
latest draft and a diff.

Dave

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> wrote:

> Dave,
>
> I think the changes you propose are reasonable.
>
> Steve
>



-- 
Dave Burke

Google UK Limited

Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76  Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W
9TQ
Registered in England Number: 3977902