IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-30

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Fri, 29 March 2019 05:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A850120190; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 22:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4xx81YOPL2wA; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 22:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orange.com (mta135.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600BB12008F; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 22:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr01.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.65]) by opfednr27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 44VrVP4BfGz4wlk; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 06:52:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.23]) by opfednr01.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 44VrVP3SCPzDq78; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 06:52:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM41.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 06:52:29 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-30
Thread-Index: AQHU2xicRsTGH2X350i3IMDpwuRCCqYiMDAw
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 05:52:28 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EA4F608@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <155257761487.2625.10003476313108979036@ietfa.amsl.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EA3DFC8@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <72f7b85c-74fb-0f79-8211-50043c2b4b47@cs.tcd.ie> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EA3E475@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <f15534d0-4c4e-171e-a092-5947eada76ca@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <f15534d0-4c4e-171e-a092-5947eada76ca@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/oZBph-UzcxOukEsmBDKlm3PgvNk>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-30
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 05:52:33 -0000

Hi Stephen, 

FWIW, a new version that integrates your comments is available online. The diff can be tracked at:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-31.txt 

Please let me know if you have further comments. 

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie]
> Envoyé : vendredi 15 mars 2019 11:20
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN; secdir@ietf.org
> Cc : draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel.all@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org;
> dots@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-30
> 
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> On 15/03/2019 06:47, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> >> ISTM that all clients can get information
> >> about how an attack is being seen at other clients, isn't that
> >> right?
> > [Med] No. A client can only get information that is bound to it.
> Where does the spec say that? I don't recall the term "bound"
> used that way but may have missed it.
> 
> And it still seems a bit hard to enforce. If two clients (one
> ok, one zombied) ask the same server/network how many packets
> targetted at 10.0.0/24 were dropped won't they get the same
> answer? (Assuming both clients are within that /24.)
> 
> Thanks,
> S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email