Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-09

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Hi Rifaat,

Thanks for your review!  We had #1 queued up for the next revision.
Trusted had single quotes around it because it isn't the term of a
product or well known term, but trusted by the organization.  I don't
like the word trust because it is loaded and used differently by many.
If others think we should remove that or the RFC editor, that's fine.

Thanks,
Kathleen

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
<[e-mail]> wrote:
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> Summary: Ready with nits
>
> The document describes security and management functions that might be
> impacted by the increased use of encryption.
> The goal of the document is to only list the potential problems, not to
> propose
> solutions to these problems.
>
>
> nits:
>
> 1. The document refers to an Appendix in multiples places, which is now
> section 7.
> 2. Page 18, second line: the word 'trusted' has quotes around it; is there a
> reason for that?
>
> Regards,
>  Rifaat
>
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen