Re: [secdir] Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06

"Adrian Farrel" <> Thu, 03 July 2014 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE481B2A40; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U9WCpImgXiG5; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADBDE1B2A3B; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (localhost.localdomain []) by (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s63LhgVd012867; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:43:42 +0100
Received: from 950129200 ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s63LheIO012816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:43:40 +0100
From: "Adrian Farrel" <>
To: "'Ben Laurie'" <>, "'The IESG'" <>, <>, <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:43:34 +0100
Message-ID: <0cf001cf9707$d88083e0$89818ba0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGtyNQpOj8eDn9j3srLWrUG7dsJjpvSfRmg
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--5.255-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--5.255-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: +c13yJDs902nykMun0J1wpmug812qIbzC/ExpXrHizw4YKAM3oRt9mn7 AlTb8W2xmbgtFJbseiaV2J8ChOmkc6XgCCul34T6TQh9A4m9EtFCdUZFvvy+kFpbYq2f4jz+UA/ QkP482j8IS5UXqe5IMYAy6p60ZV62mCXhewl0apKDGx/OQ1GV8mrz/G/ZSbVq+gtHj7OwNO2+Ij sEEOIzYupnAjXr3+OFNfID9bjStg1BIYSy4CaxJd0+kgVCxoLn
Subject: Re: [secdir] Security review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 21:43:47 -0000

Hi Ben,

Thanks for reading and letting us know your thoughts.

> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.

Could I please ask you to re-send your mail to the IETF list "just like any other last call comments" so that we can respond to them there as part of the consensus process. That is, of course, unless you feel that your comments fall into the escape clause in the last call announcement : "Exceptionally, comments may be sent to instead."