[secdir] SECDir review of draft-IETF-trill-arp-optimization-08
Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com> Fri, 30 June 2017 00:40 UTC
Return-Path: <tinatsou6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E3B126D45; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ljuSnI8OUP36; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x229.google.com (mail-pg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E29631200F3; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id j186so55403402pge.2; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5mlqVYUXnDA2eQzvGifZVlfWaiKE8Ofjafaj0vi7GmU=; b=HyoJ6e3SUET9VDP5AdMkcXQOjXMfe+/Ww7t6rpAthBWDqdrP4fD9//vnEPmxPdtmAM qZQZQ1m2gNlHWNIPP4YzGpwtQK1OXRAXBJ7T9NTE2shgRkYPsnnZFgGEpQ0L0Bj/LCtc qPYjNvdZddceE5O/lnDhouwTsqqfe+gnaxGPZ4JXhRa8aqFoAci129L3HhxHSRvgD04z VuBt42vJtRwo5QlLF+m61J4Der97Yejz8vlI1HbTyVRqlYUyWuagivOuKeSZjTx9BFNy FQOLJgEv/UqMO1RZ5tKoxv1vlA4gzaBwSlz24dMVejnUGWqeGmXcDhqfim3ShZrLGxCE t6NQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5mlqVYUXnDA2eQzvGifZVlfWaiKE8Ofjafaj0vi7GmU=; b=nZqAvZK2OwTmZXY/CGrag18bSET8H/E3HwNL1oLlULQWqOT3FGJlIEhhKkhVLkwCjl EXVZ53y3QoeH91bN3Cj3jCXfJgDzgE4xLmAFLmmCdHeD/DsD/ZS77slfUTjLpZLhpcty qV7nfmLK6sOLjItbNxLq+jkild3yR3utsTyUYQeaz9ymUKTvbhPxP1W0Ylmx9ixqR1rk CqeJUq8J//ThbJZeL0g+j/SoNwYSP5bL+0ItOD2c7jRVplxhyoygEWFJm+tWoOtmMRW2 77zzHIVlikT9bodvxiUpVdrScMx1BuKbm1iMjSEsgSkItZfrtBb0a9Rc6YdchHIO2tF/ OnWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOz0IrjMsoUBiZN9f3OqT4WUnUx+L7PlqICHHmDHperEcRPFc7Mr C6wxXj9KHimJ2D30w/BkYzZ9D8P+Cg==
X-Received: by 10.99.123.18 with SMTP id w18mr18485395pgc.122.1498783203340; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:39:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMS-Z8DXo7MVQF2NVwBYpiRd661PxPfAH+ZxW22YUpcyK+-3-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "draft-IETF-trill-arp-optimization.all@ietf.org" <draft-IETF-trill-arp-optimization.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "tina.tsou@arm.com" <tina.tsou@arm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c64ba6e3501055322a818"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/thdwmjU4J3aJEaA1L2R0uRlc07E>
Subject: [secdir] SECDir review of draft-IETF-trill-arp-optimization-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:40:08 -0000
Reviewer: Tina Tsou Review result: Ready This is a document that specifies optimized ARP/ND response for RBridge, when the target's location is known, to avoid ARP/ND query and answer flooding. >From security point of view this document is Ready. If it can describe how to store and transfer the key, it is more complete. In addition, a flow chart may help the readers to clearly understand the handling of messages in section 4. No nit was found. -- Thank you, Tina
- [secdir] SECDir review of draft-IETF-trill-arp-op… Tina Tsou
- Re: [secdir] SECDir review of draft-IETF-trill-ar… Donald Eastlake