IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Recurring issues found during sec review

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC80512041C for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AsIMi2g6H82u for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5166D12040E for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x6NFX29Z005455; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:37:14 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=OMb//9FUT+GxSBCje5xY34Eu0Uf/4QtK/TIfAfzUo9E=; b=XP8zd1x5vX8rTt1GuU7tOZuMxKA+JE/Dji1E0NifLzZUKDALQVXF7pFA9SG7mIh8AnU+ IX3Zws441A30z3jmJ/AK80+sVW3bemfdH2WhRTao1STzB0QDPc9MOTSgA7q9ctIb1MsY BSqjpW0PQalpW3/TZ+/OX+rF1fnip0rzs2Ry3sfQGySyRlT+XXMS1tRJ5ZeGHFEOC+xi K0Pis78EIHKlKgxn/5qEfGVaBSdjtettx6ZUcX7s7EQzuZCEwQEpLNnbP9TnEZUs/Avo pyV76obQ3ArL1IRo/J93Y+hrW/rVMtfJm6u7vRikkKrYwt0gwgCwdQh3n7eXqRO3xmEr BQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2twkv9b8v3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:37:13 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x6NFYvXa004788; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:37:12 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2twkf14ear-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:37:12 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:37:12 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:37:11 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:37:11 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [secdir] Recurring issues found during sec review
Thread-Index: AdVBXOvbIZa03j1BSj2dTFwg8FntWAAJKEuAAAA4B4AAAcnEgP//v9MAgABH+QD//74IgA==
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:37:11 +0000
Message-ID: <876633B1-A352-4FC2-8A77-FDC553444183@akamai.com>
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B33E17EA@marchand> <BAB87450-CF8C-4AB2-89C6-1578C4E8C273@deployingradius.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1907231009140.16355@bofh.nohats.ca> <4210BF08-7564-4F9B-9E3D-2902B0351707@deployingradius.com> <14187E3B-4436-406E-A2D6-7A514CD95925@akamai.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1907231120530.16355@bofh.nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1907231120530.16355@bofh.nohats.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1b.0.190715
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.34.217]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9D5BE15E224E564B96F675BBD7201942@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-23_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=817 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1907230155
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:5.22.84,1.0.8 definitions=2019-07-23_07:2019-07-23,2019-07-23 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=792 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1904300001 definitions=main-1907230154
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/vCCNgPbUrPnZUy9puRAS3EyQtZo>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Recurring issues found during sec review
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:37:25 -0000

    >    > That is, every MUST should have an obvious action for when it is
    >    > violated.

...

   > I'm not saying every MUST
    must have a specific and immediate sentence following saying what to do.
   

Okay.  From my quotes above, I hope you can see why I misunderstood you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email