Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts-01
Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Thu, 27 September 2012 02:59 UTC
Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7CC21F843C; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.677, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DwLhqtFf+n-9; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ec2-23-21-227-93.compute-1.amazonaws.com (ec2-23-21-227-93.compute-1.amazonaws.com [23.21.227.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0740421F8435; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-217-126-210.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.217.126.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68A0201E2; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:58:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 072A0414A; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:58:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>
References: <6BFA95AE-9F90-490B-9C63-8C7C96D2BCF3@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:58:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <6BFA95AE-9F90-490B-9C63-8C7C96D2BCF3@cisco.com> (Joseph Salowey's message of "Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:24:58 +0000")
Message-ID: <tsld318npdf.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts.all@tools.ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 02:59:04 -0000
>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) <jsalowey@cisco.com> writes: This was discussed in the WG. The simplified profile is showing its age, and perhaps should be renamed the neither simple nor preferred profile. The authors and apparently WG felt that their mechanism represents better cryptographic practice than the RFC 3961 profile.
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-camel… Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-c… Sam Hartman