[secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06
Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 08 March 2019 17:21 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B23131375; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:21:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.93.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <155206570582.3202.12517909943780959477@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:21:45 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/wi652PufUWQstk9Y-Qv5oFdUTV4>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 17:21:46 -0000
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document provides the detailed explanation of SR-MPLS processing in addition to RFC 8402. Since SR-MPLS are in the trusted domain, it is assumed that there is no malicious attacks to the nodes for the data plane and control plane. RFC8402 already has the good description on the Security Consideration for both SR-MPLS & SRv6. Best Regards, Linda Dunbar
- [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mpl… Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf… Linda Dunbar