Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-housley-id-sig-update-02

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 27 December 2017 18:01 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <151438576898.29839.16937817091950801234@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:01:40 -0500
Cc: IETF SecDir <secdir@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AF8A636E-5035-4607-A5CD-E31EAB376861@vigilsec.com>
References: <151438576898.29839.16937817091950801234@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/xzLpSh52RZ2SKUxK0fe2PRjgxjQ>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-housley-id-sig-update-02
Precedence: list

Thanks for the review.

Russ


> On Dec 27, 2017, at 9:42 AM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> This document updates the handling of digital signatures on Internet-Draft 
> document, defined in RFC5485, for non-ASCII characters in a "text" file.
> 
> This document has no impact on the security considerations specified in RFC5485, 
> and these same security considerations still apply to this new document.
> 
> Regards,
> Rifaat
> 
>

[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-housley… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-hou… Russ Housley