[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-sacm-use-cases-08
Scott Kelly <scott@hyperthought.com> Mon, 16 March 2015 00:53 UTC
Return-Path: <scott@hyperthought.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE421A1EB7 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 17:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHPT2Z813gf1 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 17:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp106.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp106.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F05F1A1E0E for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 17:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp22.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp22.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F204E1802E4; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:52:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by smtp22.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: scott-AT-hyperthought.com) with ESMTPSA id 3326A180298; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:52:56 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: scott@hyperthought.com
Received: from [172.30.10.81] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [211.217.127.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.4.2); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:52:58 GMT
From: Scott Kelly <scott@hyperthought.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <22927F03-BF7B-45EC-A9F3-6E782C1366FA@hyperthought.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:52:52 +0900
To: draft-ietf-sacm-use-cases.all@tools.ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ynicclV4rOkiMvIL7XhHcWp5F8E>
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-sacm-use-cases-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:53:00 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This informational document describes use cases for endpoint security posture assessment. The security considerations section says that specifics will be provided in related requirements, architecture, protocol, etc. documents as appropriate. I see no issues with this document.