IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Secdispatch] draft-leggett-spkac: Signed Public Key and Challenge

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 25 April 2023 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54B9C151B00 for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rofENnO0Tzzm for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88EB9C1519BB for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B795F9A0AC; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 11:03:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (unknown [96.241.2.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA42599F3F; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 11:03:58 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <E2028E09-7761-4A17-888A-BF966671D066@sharp.fm>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 11:03:58 -0400
Cc: IETF SecDispatch <secdispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3AA86A68-DD1A-481E-884B-844B7430DAD3@vigilsec.com>
References: <77101A6A-7D9C-4817-B16D-70505FA10C6D@sharp.fm> <BN2P110MB11076DA8E19230F38F1875AEDC019@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <B1A55C38-2712-453C-99B1-883E1F2BB0A7@sharp.fm> <D948A5CC-3356-436A-925A-8F333BB11440@webweaving.org> <87v8nh58kk.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <CABcZeBP3kqV5dNUc8_0qya-OWtc0o_U7ftHa=DqpQAViCkYQdg@mail.gmail.com> <AEC05A2F-8579-4BF9-A391-70358016E53B@webweaving.org> <87edu45hjp.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <B04411F8-5C06-426A-B9CF-EE54F4FF74D6@webweaving.org> <3F6DCC6F-E3FD-482F-8E5D-DF0F30FF00BD@vigilsec.com> <E2028E09-7761-4A17-888A-BF966671D066@sharp.fm>
To: Graham Leggett <minfrin=40sharp.fm@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/D6AmjDXJd6p66o3Yj2cRan7zDGk>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] draft-leggett-spkac: Signed Public Key and Challenge
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:04:04 -0000

Graham:

Yes, the module in the document compiles properly.

Russ


> On Apr 25, 2023, at 6:36 AM, Graham Leggett <minfrin=40sharp.fm@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> On 22 Nov 2022, at 19:09, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
>> I took a look at the ASN.1 module.  It compiles without error.
>> 
>> This module uses DEFINITIONS AUTOMATIC TAGS, but there are no structures that needs tags.  I suggest that DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS would allow more tools to use the module.
> 
> I submitted a new draft with this fixed, are you able to take a look that I did it correctly?
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/staging/draft-leggett-spkac-02.html
> 
> Regards,
> Graham
> —
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Secdispatch mailing list
> Secdispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email