Re: [Secdispatch] Requesting agenda time for draft-knodel-e2ee-definition

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 07 July 2021 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE763A163D; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 06:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kyPcJISqmXlm; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 06:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367F93A163C; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 06:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GKg9V1Zy3z2xG9; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 15:23:42 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <1adb0acc-39c5-1d47-3522-88d67f2ef60e@lear.ch>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 15:23:41 +0200
Cc: Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org>, "secdispatch-chairs@ietf.org" <secdispatch-chairs@ietf.org>, secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 647357021.62851-2a734ca9009cbd1a52fa13af60f026c4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <65230170-A28A-4CF8-B904-6A89198B8656@tzi.org>
References: <fcaaedd9-19f3-0d22-9ec9-7bc804750c06@cdt.org> <1adb0acc-39c5-1d47-3522-88d67f2ef60e@lear.ch>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/LR0BFmTv2Dw9IWF7gDF1ujJfUHw>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] Requesting agenda time for draft-knodel-e2ee-definition
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 13:23:50 -0000

On 2021-07-07, at 15:04, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> wrote:
> 
> I am hoping that you don't actually mean to create a new definition of a term that has been around at least since 1984.  I think what you mean to do is to establish an aspirational model that leads to a state in which certain conditions hold true.  Would I be wrong?

As in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1775
?

Grüße, Carsten