IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Secdispatch] Marking SPKAC as Historic

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Thu, 10 November 2022 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AFBC15259C for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:00:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vH8VGB-IIkwX for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:00:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9229CC157B33 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:59:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id s10so1839196ioa.5 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:59:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=135kxRLJh4o3+oYJze30q50hK1rIFwELvi9Mi7y7OXI=; b=bFq+6zOolsiIdahoHRg7+C6MJZkmvMMmTJ6f92E9OPiZTkxMU7qIHNeeFh9QXOmpOT 7n1SIPlYNjZeDOm0b48eMJjbwX+50Cc5jk+QRIIeT/qEfreNN98ai8sSgVmvHXIJVykE aI7aNfYgoAFUKxa2bZoPJfkF+7xB0AenSqSp063lyGKhB9mfYxu1KKZkPtYqp6ghpGBL DCOpZKMzee6ALftYsW9amJuY4vpTbrEIq7YCzQ60RiUwVfyAhmMbTk0up1h7CyrhQnJn 3o6jZgAuWW6IvyF6ugnQ+RYUZ7Cp44ySBbfimUyS3lVDzO1ppsx+zlNDRtGUVPKoPqDf aYkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=135kxRLJh4o3+oYJze30q50hK1rIFwELvi9Mi7y7OXI=; b=hbl0F3fxEWRE0du5nJcVWQUSmCQxZ0BkJ6OdCyKJFC0oRK0vxzTwpPF9sgVNfpWhwH 4F1nwrF9DQEW5hj5jP/Z5+Upl8XjhcKCCnDQl9HQt3Mx+CkgKs7SZgi7XGQVL022CqfZ efFq/u7Cd9Bsvk/S7LeTUzZBeiYVxeTq/b+XSVcVYDnNJ1GOwJwpLUQK05GLIx7J9kwH Ywy1ssKRzcV0iRAocxZncIBD+gqhod+OVnqv750+bYqgd8AVXNVTGmI45TUlKW6CdZt9 y3rjyYAEFdXWMhz3P4VVSGJWBZYVBE7Z8DcLRpf4gUzEej5oNv3icz+Rqa69ylz1ci+e Vnbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0HxbrE658X5g8KHrjTEZLI8cdz97b1u8AkVFNjMDH0DRP/31Sk AcKiwuaXuv69BK1exARyxkRXwbPbwIVocTQ13y0jT4vZDVznlA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM43LHFayfpmfR00sZQ0TObHP9Uji3iXe6UlC7rjTgKrr1cbrx4utSCaefdXXcU6BbiVRQ0qXcWYG9+I3Paz7zg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:263:b0:375:6c50:ca08 with SMTP id x3-20020a056638026300b003756c50ca08mr3436941jaq.258.1668103153020; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:59:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:59:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsAPOw-PRHOh9OO1fU3tkN2ywWvAihG-2xWyu_SPgTYzLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: secdispatch@ietf.org, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="000000000000e9845b05ed218712"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/PwaKkTE8QEZQv1uyVHa9Dyfz4CQ>
Subject: [Secdispatch] Marking SPKAC as Historic
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 18:00:18 -0000

I want to float the idea of marking the SPKAC Informational draft as
Historic, assuming it is completed and published.  I think that might
accurately reflect the consensus of the IETF regarding SPKAC.

Marking a document Historic at the time of publication is unusual, but it
seems logical when we are (finally) describing a format that has seen
little use since the 90s and is not recommended today.

I imagine that the sponsoring AD can choose the status without too much
process overhead.

--Ben Schwartz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email