Moving forward with draft-igoe (Was: Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak")

Tim Polk <tim.polk@nist.gov> Wed, 03 June 2009 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces-ietf-ssh-owner-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive=lists.ietf.org@NetBSD.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C193A6D0E for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TrQ5i1YDkl0s for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.NetBSD.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:7:2e0:81ff:fe52:9ab6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053C03A6C1B for <secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 0) id 8B56A63B185; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:04:46 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org
Received: from smtp.nist.gov (rimp1.nist.gov [129.6.16.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 373E363B13C for <ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:04:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [129.6.224.231] ([129.6.224.231]) by smtp.nist.gov (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n53IsHrj022483; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:54:25 -0400
From: Tim Polk <tim.polk@nist.gov>
To: ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <20090602183655.GQ29258@Sun.COM>
Subject: Moving forward with draft-igoe (Was: Re: applying AES-GCM to secure shell: proposed "tweak")
References: <E1LrmWj-0001u4-EQ@wintermute01.cs.auckland.ac.nz> <49DE51A1.6020602@vandyke.com> <200904100049.UAA02426@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> <20090410043105.GR1500@Sun.COM> <200904100555.BAA11295@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> <20090602183655.GQ29258@Sun.COM>
Message-Id: <A276CAC0-6A52-4426-971B-1B81920A0756@nist.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:54:17 -0400
Cc: Pasi Eronen <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>, draft-igoe-secsh-aes-gcm@tools.ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-NIST-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-NIST-MailScanner-From: tim.polk@nist.gov
Sender: ietf-ssh-owner@NetBSD.org
List-Id: ietf-ssh
Precedence: list

Folks,

I have decided to move forward with publication of draft-igoe-secsh- 
aes-gcm, "AES Galois Counter Mode for the Secure Shell Transport Layer  
Protocol", as an Informational RFC.  I have been very pleased by the  
strong interest on this concluded wg list, and encourage people to  
continue discussing a general solution.  If this moves from the  
discussion stage to draft development, I would be delighted to sponsor  
publication of such a draft.

However, I have also concluded based on that discussion that draft- 
igoe-secsh-aes-gcm - in its current form - fills an immediate need.  I  
also do not believe it is the authors' responsibility to develop a  
generic solution (e.g., negotiating whether the length should be  
encrypted).    That said, I will refocus my near term efforts on  
clearing the remaining discuss so that the draft can be published.  I  
do not believe this should impact any long term efforts that result  
from this discussion, and reiterate my support for publication of a  
generic solution.

Thanks,

Tim Polk